Personally, I don't think changing the rules on someone to restrict their admittance is fair, but that's my opinion, i am not an administrator and i realize decisions as such are difficult for you guys, and i know you guys are just trying to keep everyone happy and do what you think is best, but i don't agree with it. That's the privilege we all have as non admins.
I thought putting tioga as a trial member(if he got the votes) and evaluating him as such would have been a great idea considering his past history it would have given members and himself the opportunity to prove he was or was not worthy of the full tag.
Being a trial member anywhere gives the admins the ability to kick someone for being an "imp".
To address the bullshit:
Some of you are acting like IMPS in this thread in my opinion and I don't think it reflects very well on us.
I don't see why its so hard to say No or Yes and give a reason like an adult.
All this "you are stupid" "you are gay" "i hate you" "i never hit puberty" "i still live in my moms basement" shit is annoying and really immature yet very entertaining to my sadistic side.
Do i still give him shit? Absolutely, he deserves it for being a human being like all of the rest of you.
Votes:
Yes
Verrater
Grjiun
PointGuard
Chachi wan
Gamp
Sniper 777
TeabagPsc
Icomrade
B-e-t-a
Dracolyes
No
Arson (dead set)
Ripley (for now)
Tsopka (dead set)
Visk (dead set)
HolyDiver (dead set) (abandoner)
DMC_Rulez (dead set)
Poobar (dead set)
Wardy (undecided)
By my count, that's 10 yes 7 no.
So evil are you saying he can still be trial member with 10 votes yes and 7 no as he would have more yes than no? (I'm still confused) (lol)
I don't think I would have gotten all votes yes on my app if I wouldn't have gotten in before this voting stuff. 
Verrater