comrade, what do you mean that graph proves me wrong? That graph shows the Hyper 212+ delivering the best performance, as the article explains "lower line is the best performance in this presentation of the data - lower temperatures represent better performance."
And please do not call people names in our forums.
I'm ok with new maps, but as always the purpose of a scrim is for us to get better. This is probably best done with traditional maps that we have high chances of playing.
I vote for desolation next time 
Hi.
Please join us on TS. If you're still interested in joining OSF after playing with all of us for awhile, then submit an application.
Short notice.
Let's pick a date at date a week from now.
Take about $100 off of your case budget and consider putting it into graphics. I see you have a link to a 4850. Dual 4850's provide tremendous bang for your buck, but if you're going the X58 route, I'd put even more into graphics otherwise you'd be wasting CPU potential. If you take the AMD mobo/CPU route, I'd say the 4850's will make for a balanced rig overall.
I also noticed that you were looking at the Hyper 212+ cooler. I do not mean to tread on Ripley's CPU cooler advice, but I will once again recommend the Cooler Master Hyper 212+ it is under $30 and provides the best cooling you can get with air. This is likely because of the new "direct-contact heat pipe design", which we will probably now be seeing on all future CPU coolers. Maximum PC has yet to find an air cooler or pre-built liquid cooling system that can compete with Hyper 212+'s level of cooling performance. Tomshardware also raves over it's performance and ease of installation and I can attest to that.
Have you considered going with a P55 mobo and LGA 1156 CPU? The $200 i5-750 is worth looking into, as it provides $1,000 Core i7-975 Extreme level of performance in terms of gaming when overclocked (obviously, the $1000 Core i7-975 Extreme will be on top in applications that take advantage of extra threads).
Arborist, even though I'm sure I must have had the most claymore kills that round, I agree about the excessive clays. However, I have decided not to support a zero claymore rule. I would vote to decrease the limit to 1 or 2 for scrims, as they can and should be available for tactical usage in my opinion.
Eliminating clays outright will lead to us forgetting to look for them and not knowing where to look for them when we play against others. Still, 4 is too many for a scrim.
About speed mode: I'd like to ask everyone to please not rely on it. Obviously, it is sometimes used on accident, which is why we cannot ever make a no-tolerance rule regarding speed mode. I am just asking everyone to please not use it repeatedly in the next scrim, as I feel it is used more to take advantage of lag and induce teleporting than it is used because it is a good tactic.
Once again, today's scrim was very close, as neither team had the lead in energy for the entire game.
And Tryton (and the rest of your team), I do apologize for the proto camping. It is not something I enjoyed and I do realize it is something that was highly annoying, as it doesn't take a great deal of skill. To be fair, I did make it a point to help my team's energy crew a few times (although that mostly consisted of energy site camping).
All in all, I felt it was yet another good game, despite some lost connections and late joiners near the end of the game.
SS taken after game ended. Visk joined US team with 20 min remaining and Pointer was on NK team:
Version 3 is available for download in the TS lobby's file browser.
He was cheating against us.
You may remove the NO from Pro_Commando's, as he is no longer an OSF member.
Yes there was confusion.
Glad to have cleared it up
Hey guys, it's CloWn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAS1p6U3UvU#t=72
(for those who play in the Saint Louis server)
We'll extend his application, but he still needs to get the required amount of votes (11 at this time).
I think there may be some confusion here. Terror is trying to overclock. Arborist was the one who mentioned some high temperatures on his PC, to which I recommended the cheap CPU cooler.
@Arb- let us know if you make any progress on Ginia's machine.
And Mike, if you do find some overclocking headroom available on that chip, you'll need some benchmarking programs to see how much it helped. As far as synthetic benchmarks go, 3dmark '06 is probably among the most popular. And if you want some real world results that pertain to the games you're interested in, you might want to check out the Crysis Warhead benchmark (Google them once you've settled on a stable overclock).
I'm in it now at the time of this post and I've been in and out of it for about the last 10 hours.
Hyper 212+ best air cooler in the world and it's under $30.
thanks for the theme song....the song fits, I can't deny it.
It's ok that he created a new app; I've deleted his first one.
Looks like AMD's hexa-core is getting raped in these benchmark tests. Tom's editors use the word "creamed" here to describe just how poorly it performs: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ph…0fx,2613-9.html
So you vote for anyone that has played while you were playing? Come on, Shan.
Thanks Evil for the brillant idea, Thank God everything works perfect again.
Meh, wont have a excuse to buy new ''better'' parts now
Excellent! Now that you're back on your feet, you can either:
A) Get chickened out of overclocking
or
B) Continue to tinker, but do not play with voltages until you've first hit a clock speed wall. At that point, if you want to go further, you can start upping voltages but only a little at a time from now on!
